s-mailx  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [S-mailx] .nailrc and Gmail Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.16 ("Message of Winter, your hopes shall be crushed") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Make s-nail reproducible on Arch Linux Jelle van der Waa
  • Re: [S-mailx] Make s-nail reproducible on Arch Linux Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] viewing a single email file SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] viewing a single email file Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Crashing it is still possible. And more noise.. Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Chih-Hsuan Yen
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Chih-Hsuan Yen
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Martin Neitzel
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Chih-Hsuan Yen
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx or s-nail as the package name for package managers? Chih-Hsuan Yen
• [S-mailx] [PATCH] Fix logic of __stripfile(). Yasuhiro KIMURA
  • Re: [S-mailx] [PATCH] Fix logic of __stripfile(). Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.15 ("Tit family in the trees") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] FYI: v14.9.15 to be released on 2019-08-15 Steffen Nurpmeso
  • [S-mailx] One day more.. (Was: Re: FYI: v14.9.15 to be released on 2019-08-15) Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] 14.9.14: Entered Headers Echod Back. Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] 14.9.14: Entered Headers Echod Back. Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.14 ("Great tit passed moult") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] struggle setting up s-nail Ralph Keller
  • Re: [S-mailx] struggle setting up s-nail Steffen Nurpmeso
• Re: [S-mailx] Bug#930691: s-nail chops off two characters off of the Kerberos hostname when using gssapi auth Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Bug#930691: s-nail chops off two characters off of the Kerberos hostname when using gssapi auth Paride Legovini
  • Re: [S-mailx] Bug#930691: s-nail chops off two characters off of the Kerberos hostname when using gssapi auth Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Martin T
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Martin T
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Martin T
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Martin T
  • Re: [S-mailx] Gmail not able to decode the encoded "Subject:" field value Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Rachel (NeverBounce)
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Rachel (NeverBounce)
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Ralph Corderoy (NeverBounce)
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Rachel (NeverBounce)
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: false positive Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Error + Docker SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Error + Docker Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Error + Docker Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Error + Docker SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Error + Docker Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Error + Docker Cág
• [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Johannes Schöpfer
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Johannes Schöpfer
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Martin Lucina
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Paride Legovini
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Paride Legovini
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Unable to compile stable/stable on Debian testing Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.13 ("Blue tit's spiral marriage swoop") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.12 ("Blue tit's spiral marriage swoop") Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.12 ("Blue tit's spiral marriage swoop") johannes
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.12 ("Blue tit's spiral marriage swoop") Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.12 ("Blue tit's spiral marriage swoop") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Not a joke: how to avoid 42 Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Not a joke: how to avoid 42 Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Not a joke: how to avoid 42 Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] s-mailx doesn't quit when it can't write russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] s-mailx doesn't quit when it can't write Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] (Delaying v14.9.12 release about two weeks) Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Advice on using the -M flag Joan
  • Re: [S-mailx] Advice on using the -M flag Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Advice on using the -M flag Joan
• [S-mailx] Fwd: s-nail 14.9.11 fails to initialize PRNG Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Fwd: s-nail 14.9.11 fails to initialize PRNG Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] mimeview doesn't page russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] mimeview doesn't page Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] mimeview doesn't page Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] mimeview doesn't page russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] mimeview doesn't page Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Werner Fink
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Dr. Werner Fink
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Predrag Punosevac
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] New at s-mailx/s-nail but maintainer of old heilroom-mailx Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format SZÉPE Viktor
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] messages to s-mailx list; date format Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Proper formatting of date for From lines russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] Proper formatting of date for From lines Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] Proper formatting of date for From lines Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Proper formatting of date for From lines russellbell
• [S-mailx] non-conforming From lines russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] non-conforming From lines Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] ' MBOX mailbox contains non-conforming From_ line(s)! ' russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] ' MBOX mailbox contains non-conforming From_ line(s)! ' Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] error: Snorkeling on an empty pipe russellbell
  • Re: [S-mailx] error: Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] error: Snorkeling on an empty pipe johannes
  • Re: [S-mailx] error: Snorkeling on an empty pipe Steffen Nurpmeso
  • [S-mailx] "ERROR#" ring feature Martin Neitzel
  • Re: [S-mailx] "ERROR#" ring feature Paul Vojta
  • Re: [S-mailx] "ERROR#" ring feature Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] "ERROR#" ring feature Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] response to errors russellbell
• [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] S-nail segfaults and dumps a core Cág
• [S-mailx] EOF in Type-Ahead Becomes NUL. Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] EOF in Type-Ahead Becomes NUL. Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] EOF in Type-Ahead Becomes NUL. Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: [S-mailx] EOF in Type-Ahead Becomes NUL. Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.11 ("Tit family enjoying a bath") Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.11 ("Tit family enjoying a bath") Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.11 ("Tit family enjoying a bath") Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.11 ("Tit family enjoying a bath") Cág
  • Re: [S-mailx] [ANN]ounce of S-nail v14.9.11 ("Tit family enjoying a bath") Steffen Nurpmeso
• [S-mailx] Cc: and From: Sender: don't work together Michael Dressel
  • Re: [S-mailx] Cc: and From: Sender: don't work together Steffen Nurpmeso
  • Re: [S-mailx] Cc: and From: Sender: don't work together Michael Dressel

• Earlier messages
• Later messages