> In my considered opinion, Erik was being facetious. I was trying to be as well. Unfortunately, I note my spelling is rather poor.
On Dec 24, 1:37 pm, "PATRICK MOORE" <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my considered opinion, Erik was being facetious. > > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:35 PM, JoelMatthews <joelmatth...@mac.com> wrote: > > > > They both work fine, and I still have no idea what the original 'problem' > > > even was. Ride your bike, and by all means if you need that extra .3 mph > > in > > > a sprint convert to threadless--just don't overlook my concise > > introduction > > > to the oft-overlooked reality of stem planing, ok? > > > Well, thank you for the holiday wishes Erik (and back at you!), but I > > fear your planing theory does not advance the debate, at least as I > > understand it.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
