On 5/31/2013 at 10:23 PM Jim Wright wrote:

|On May 31, 2013, at 3:56 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wrote:
|
|> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
is
|time to change the release numbering scheme.
|
|If they can't figure it out, they shouldn't be running a mail server. 
|There is nothing wrong with the version numbering.
 =============

I cannot disagree with the former.

The latter, however, maybe there is an area for improvement with the
current numbering sequence.  Discussion on the topic is, imo, good.



Reply via email to