On 5/31/2013 at 10:23 PM Jim Wright wrote:
|On May 31, 2013, at 3:56 PM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote: | |> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it is |time to change the release numbering scheme. | |If they can't figure it out, they shouldn't be running a mail server. |There is nothing wrong with the version numbering. ============= I cannot disagree with the former. The latter, however, maybe there is an area for improvement with the current numbering sequence. Discussion on the topic is, imo, good.