On 5/31/2013 at 4:56 PM wie...@porcupine.org wrote: |After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, =============
In 20/20 hindsight, perhaps Postfix 2.1 should have been Postfix 2.01, allowing 100 minor versions before the major version was forced to change. I have a similar problem on my TV. The Cable Company give me channels 12.1 and 12.100, when they really mean 12.001 and 12.100. Going forward, I would prefer a major.minor.patch type of numbering sequence, with leading zeros as appropriate in the minor and patch numbers. I will also state that regardless of the numbering paradigm you decide upon, I will continue to use and learn from the Postfix software and community. Thanks!
