After 2.9, it should have been 3, not 2.10 ;)
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Len Conrad <lcon...@go2france.com> wrote: > At 07:18 AM 6/1/2013, you wrote: >> Am 31.05.2013 22:56, schrieb Wietse Venema: >>> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it >>> is time to change the release numbering scheme. > > don't dumb postfix down. keep the current numbering style. > > Len > > >
