postfix-users  

Messages by Thread

• [pfx] Configuring a milter for quarantine/hold actions (documentation clarifications) Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Paul Tomblin via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Trying to limit the number of users per connection and the number of concurrent connections to one domain Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Attention: Postfix maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Attention: Postfix maintainers Bluejay Adametz via Postfix-users
• [pfx] restricting sender to single domain David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] restricting sender to single domain Klaus Tachtler via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: restricting sender to single domain Nick Tait via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Sean McBride via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Sean McBride via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.4 and legacy releases 3.10.11, 3.9.12, 3.8.18 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] How to solve error message with sasl_passwd Freek de Kruijf via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: How to solve error message with sasl_passwd Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not using configured address_verify_sender Victoriano Giralt via Postfix-users
• [pfx] The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: The "danecheck" monitoring tool has been updated Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Fred Morris via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I keep getting disabled on [email protected] mailing list Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix not able to forward emails Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Al via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix not able to forward emails Bill Cole via Postfix-users
• [pfx] ANN: TCP Table reference implementation in Python Fred Morris via Postfix-users
• [pfx] your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? P V Anthony via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Frank Reid via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Dimitris T. via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] ***SPAM*** Re: Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Dimitris T. via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Re: your favorite "mailserver in a box" featuring Postfix? Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users
• [pfx] rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Linkcheck via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Linkcheck via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Linkcheck via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: rejection of message due to mismatch in TLS versions Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] empty from envelope? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Peter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Jim Garrison via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Jim Seymour via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Charles Sprickman via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: empty from envelope? Mel P via Postfix-users
• [pfx] use postfix/master as "supervisor" only A.Schulze via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: use postfix/master as "supervisor" only Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: use postfix/master as "supervisor" only Colin McKinnon via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Call for Testing: OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC Dan Mahoney via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Call for Testing: OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Lafiel Elentari via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Delays of few seconds are often observed in send mail Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Mel P via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Mel P via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Mel P via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Mel P via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Mel P via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Should the configuration upgrade process still append "inet_protocols = ipv4"? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] multi line configuration parameters with # remarks David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: multi line configuration parameters with # remarks Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: multi line configuration parameters with # remarks Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] External command delivery using virtual_alias_maps? Lombra via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: External command delivery using virtual_alias_maps? Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence Rajesh Mishra via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence Rajesh Mishra via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Is virtual_mailbox_maps redundant when virtual_alias_maps already checks mailbox existence Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd milter correction — execution order question Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd milter correction — execution order question Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd milter correction — execution order question Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd milter correction — execution order question Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: header_checks sees original From: header despite smtpd milter correction — execution order question Pedro David Marco via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17 Peter via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Postfix stable release 3.11.3 and legacy releases 3.10.10, 3.9.11, 3.8.17 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling David Koski via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] SSL Errors Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SSL Errors Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
• [pfx] postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux Changqing Li via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: PATCH: postfix 3.11.2 build failed with musl lib on linux Michael Orlitzky via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server John Fawcett via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server John Fawcett via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Per recipient sender access via an access policy delegation server Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] I'd like to understand this Gerben Wierda via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I'd like to understand this Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: I'd like to understand this Gerben Wierda via Postfix-users
• [pfx] SHA224 Phase out luca-lists--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out luca-lists--- via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: SHA224 Phase out Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault) Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault) Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Patch service_name RO logic (was: snapshot 3.12-20260508 postscreen segfault) Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
• [pfx] virtual_alias_map and processing order BuzzSaw Code via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: virtual_alias_map and processing order BuzzSaw Code via Postfix-users
• [pfx] Errors in collate output Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Errors in collate output Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: Errors in collate output Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
• [pfx] dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Bill Cole via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
  • [pfx] Re: dkim and meddlesome (?) relay-hosts Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users

• Earlier messages