On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 17:33 -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote: > I've always found the OpenBSD method the easiest. after 2.9 comes 3.0 then > 3.1....3.9 then 4.0. Guess that depends on how one interprets version "numbers"....
Is it a plain number? Then the model as also used by OpenBSD makes sense as 3.1 == 3.10 But OTOH, why then using fraction numbers at all, instead of simply counting 1, 2, 3.... ? If you interpret some semantics into the version string, then the "." is just the separator between distinct numbers. Cheers, Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
