> > One of the most common reasons for a temporary delivery failure is a full > mailbox. Or, where the remote server is acting as a store-and-forward, a > temporary inability to verify the validity of the destination address.
I dont agree with that. Connection time out is the most common reason for temporary failure (in my case). > > I'd be very annoyed if I didn't get an email I was expecting because someone > else on my system had forgotten to empty their mailbox, or because another > customer of my upstream server had an outage and wasn't able to verify > recipients. Mark, I don't think that postfix should stop sending to that domain for ever or that it should send the email back to the sender. I just think that postfix could have a way to hold the mail queue for a specific time based on specific and consecutive errors. Lets say for example, 100 errors in sequence to the same destination domain. Why keep trying if we're unable to deliver to that domain at the time? > > Mark > -- > Please take a short survey about the Leveson Report: http://meyu.eu/ak Rafael
