Am 08.01.2013 17:44, schrieb Mark Goodge: > On 08/01/2013 16:38, Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE wrote: >> Em 08/01/2013, às 14:21, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> >> escreveu: >> >>> Rafael Azevedo - IAGENTE: >>>> Why keep trying when we have a clear signal of a temporary >>>> error? >>> >>> As Victor noted Postfix does not keep trying the SAME delivery. >> >> Yes you're right and I know that. But it keeps trying for another >> recipients in the same domain. > > Which is absolutely the correct behaviour. > > One of the most common reasons for a temporary delivery failure is a full > mailbox. Or, where the remote server is > acting as a store-and-forward, a temporary inability to verify the validity > of the destination address. > > I'd be very annoyed if I didn't get an email I was expecting because someone > else on my system had forgotten to > empty their mailbox, or because another customer of my upstream server had an > outage and wasn't able to verify > recipients.
yes that is all right for any "normal" mail but if you send out a newsletter you have likely a lot of users to big ISP's, Telekom Austria even rejects temporary for whitelisted senders since every smart admin spilts newsletter-relays from the normal business mail a configuration option would help while not hurt your case
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
