On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:42:16PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 17.04.2012 12:38, schrieb Henrik K: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:12:53PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> how do you act with us as example? > >> you are sending a message to me to MX "barracuda.thelounge.net" > >> well, you whitelist "barracuda.thelounge.net" > >> but you will never receive any message from our spamfirewall > >> > >> this is a typical business case > > > > Stop spreading stupid FUD. It works in _majority_ of cases. > > > > If you don't understand what benefits such whitelisting achieves, then just > > be silent and don't use it. > > the majority has outgoing and incoming on the same IP? > in which world are you living?
Statistics speak for themselves. Come back with hard facts instead of your FUD. > i don't use it BECAUSE i understand the non-benefits Non-benefits? Like wasting few bytes of memory for keeping "barracuda.thelounge.net" in database even if it never matches? I guess if you are very short on memory then yes.. otherwise I don't understand what you example has anything to do with anything.
