Am 17.04.2012 13:37, schrieb Henrik K: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0100, Sam Jones wrote: >> Just imagine whitelisting a shared, spammy server because a domain is >> hosted on it. Naturally it will probably come through greylisting in the >> end anyway, but I'd not go out of my way to make it easy on them! > > It's fine to imagine many worst case scenarios, but it doesn't mean that you > actually ever encounter one or that they even exist. > > A shared server or similar could be sending both ham and spam. I'm sure you > would rather receive the ham instead of rejecting it straight away.
this would be true if greylisting would "rejecting straight away" but greylisting don't by design it kills only RFC ignorant MTA's servers of people with permanent communication are whitelisted automatically by design, the other messages are only delayed so this sounds like "having solution, searching for problem"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
