On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:54:10PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > the hard facts are that EVERY site using a dedicated > spamfilter (own appliance or external service) have > different IP's for MX and outgoing mail
So? Postpals also looks at whole /24 subnets and also can compare sender/recipient emails. > additionally most big sites have MANY outgoing mailservers I guess this would be new information for someone who doesn't have a clue. And it has little to do with how postpals performs in real life. Have you even READ the description? "This is important because many legimate servers are located in dynamic looking networks etc, which commonly result in false rejects." Catching your "big sites" is not a goal worth mentioning. Your "big sites" are very likely to be on global whitelists already. > >> i don't use it BECAUSE i understand the non-benefits > > > > Non-benefits? Like wasting few bytes of memory for keeping > > "barracuda.thelounge.net" in database even if it never matches? > > what excatly do you not understand in the word "benefit"? > where did i say anything about wasting memory? > please consult google the explain "benefit" You haven't actually said _anything_, only spread unnecessary doubt to everyone. > however, do what YOU want if you are happy, but accept > that there other people which are calling it nonsense Some people actually test theories before calling them nonsense. You haven't made a single point why there would be "non-benefits" in running postpals.
