> > > Cedrick > > My goal is one step at a time. > I do not want grand plan. Just something working in one image.
Yes sure. But at this is an important requirement for me, I prefer to talk about it first :) > Stef > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Cédrick Béler <cdric...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Besides all suggested ideas on the previous mail, what’s very important to >> me is being able to run processes between several images considering 1 image >> = 1 actor. >> >> At first, we can consider both actor being on the same image (what Stephane >> wants first) but my requirement number 1 is having 1 actor by image and >> therefore having the possibility to trigger DistantSubWorkflow. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Cédrick >
