I‘m in there, too, because I feel the same importance. Need to allocate some time
Norbert > Am 21.01.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: > > Hi hernan > > I will try to allocate more time to understand the execution because I > think that this is important > for our community to get a workflow engine. > So I take it as a reverse engineering exercise. Now I'm super busy so > I will get slow on it. > > Stef > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Hernán Morales Durand > <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Stef, >> >> 2018-01-21 5:17 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi hernan >>> >>> I started to clean the code in my fork. >>> If you want to contribute let me know. >> >> I don't know enough about workflow implementations yet. However I know >> how to run or what to expect from them. >> So I could give some feedback from there at first. >> >>> I started to clean all misclassified methods to force me to read the >>> code. (I used them as a marker to know if I passed on the code). >> >> That could result in a nice browser feature: To flag methods from menu >> item adding specific icon, maybe possible in Calypso? :) >> >>> For the moment I made sure that the code loads. >>> - I created the variable as subclass of Object >>> - I removed the dependencies to omnibase. >>> >>> I added class comments about what I understood. >>> I'm about to continue writing structural tests >>> and I will start to try to understand how to run a workflow. >>> >> >> Maybe someone at Netstyle has some expressions to begin with? >> >> Hernán >> >> >>> Stef >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Hernán Morales Durand >>> <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I decided to give a try to Aare or Workflow in Pharo 6, following >>>> instructions in https://github.com/Netstyle/Workflow . However, the >>>> installation script raised a Warning about missing WADynamicVariable >>>> class. Should I install Seaside? >>>> >>>> I've been using a couple of bioinformatics workflows the last years, >>>> specially Taverna (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Taverna) and >>>> Galaxy (https://www.galaxyproject.org/) both of them huge code bases >>>> maintained since some years now and with very active communities from >>>> biological sciences. I found a cool video showing Galaxy features: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVYzMWWRMN8 >>>> >>>> As impressive as you may think, they are not a Panacea for workflow >>>> execution. An installation process could get really complicated, for >>>> example interfacing with nginx and PostgreSQL, and customization of >>>> toolshed could end in endless editing XML specifications. >>>> >>>> I just skim through the white paper, but unfortunately didn't >>>> recognized any of the compared features or workflow systems. >>>> Is Aare intended to support only business workflows patterns? >>>> Considering the Galaxy video above, do you think scientific workflows >>>> could be supported in Aare or it is a completely different route? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Hernán >>>> >>> >>
