Hi hernan

I will try to allocate more time to understand the execution because I
think that this is important
for our community to get a workflow engine.
So I take it as a reverse engineering exercise. Now I'm super busy so
I will get slow on it.

Stef

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Hernán Morales Durand
<hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> 2018-01-21 5:17 GMT-03:00 Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi hernan
>>
>> I started to clean the code in my fork.
>> If you want to contribute let me know.
>
> I don't know enough about workflow implementations yet. However I know
> how to run or what to expect from them.
> So I could give some feedback from there at first.
>
>> I started to clean all misclassified methods to force me to  read the
>> code. (I used them as a marker to know if I passed on the code).
>
> That could result in a nice browser feature: To flag methods from menu
> item adding specific icon, maybe possible in Calypso? :)
>
>> For the moment I made sure that the code loads.
>> - I created the variable as subclass of Object
>> - I removed the dependencies to omnibase.
>>
>> I added class comments about what I understood.
>> I'm about to continue writing structural tests
>> and I will start to try to understand how to run a workflow.
>>
>
> Maybe someone at Netstyle has some expressions to begin with?
>
> Hernán
>
>
>> Stef
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Hernán Morales Durand
>> <hernan.mora...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I decided to give a try to Aare or Workflow in Pharo 6, following
>>> instructions in https://github.com/Netstyle/Workflow . However, the
>>> installation script raised a Warning about missing WADynamicVariable
>>> class. Should I install Seaside?
>>>
>>> I've been using a couple of bioinformatics workflows the last years,
>>> specially Taverna (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Taverna) and
>>> Galaxy (https://www.galaxyproject.org/) both of them huge code bases
>>> maintained since some years now and with very active communities from
>>> biological sciences. I found a cool video showing Galaxy features:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVYzMWWRMN8
>>>
>>> As impressive as you may think, they are not a Panacea for workflow
>>> execution. An installation process could get really complicated, for
>>> example interfacing with nginx and PostgreSQL, and customization of
>>> toolshed could end in endless editing XML specifications.
>>>
>>> I just skim through the white paper, but unfortunately didn't
>>> recognized any of the compared features or workflow systems.
>>> Is Aare intended to support only business workflows patterns?
>>> Considering the Galaxy video above, do you think scientific workflows
>>> could be supported in Aare or it is a completely different route?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Hernán
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to