So far coding solo with git and filetree has been painless and
straightforward for me, I use github for public and gitlab for private
projects. I do not use configurations other than copy pasting one for
adding my project in Package browser. I do not use versioner because a
simple copy paste is enough. I do not use iceberg I prefer my favourite git
client "gitup". My experience has been both simpler, easier and far more
reliable than working with the pharo vcs and smalltalkhub. But I was
already familiar with git because I was already an experienced python coder
, and still am, way before working with Pharo.

I have made a tutorial about Pharo and git that can be viewed here. Its
with sourcetree not gitup because gitup is only available for macos and I
wanted to make a tutorial that would work on all 3 major desktop OSes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2WNYDtO0cE

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:56 PM Thierry Goubier <thierry.goub...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Le 11/05/2017 à 20:52, Stephane Ducasse a écrit :
> > Joachim
> >
> > many people are using Pharo to develop ***COMPLEX*** Pharo applications
> > and it works. They use monticello and metacello and it works.
> > So you do not have to have Github to make great software in Pharo.
> >
> > Now in addition many people are using github to build complex
> applications
> > with github.
>
> And people have been building complex applications with Monticello,
> Metacello and Github...
>
> Thierry
>
> >
> > Stef
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name
> > <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>     Am 11.05.2017 um 08:54 schrieb jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
> >>     <mailto:jtuc...@objektfabrik.de>:
> >>
> >>     Hi Norbert,
> >>
> >>     thanks for your explanations.
> >>     So it seems liek I should start by using Pharo6 and load Iceberg
> >>     and just take a look.
> >>
> >     Yes, iceberg has still some issues but is usable and it will evolve
> >     quickly. If you are the brave type of guy you can start with pharo6
> >     64bits ;)
> >
> >     Norbert
> >
> >>     Joachim
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>     Am 10.05.17 um 10:34 schrieb Norbert Hartl:
> >>>     Hi Joachim,
> >>>
> >>>     I think your timing is quite good. We had some changes in the
> >>>     last years and it is getting better now.
> >>>     Before we had only monticello. Monticello is a zip container that
> >>>     contains a version number in the filename and prior version
> >>>     pointer inside the repository. Regarding dependencies there was
> >>>     nothing that was used widely. Then Metacello appeared and solved
> >>>     the problem by providing dependency management and versioning of
> >>>     dependencies. Dependency management works good, the integrated
> >>>     versioning has issues. Especially when you look at a system like
> >>>     git you can see that versioning is solved there. Filetree is
> >>>     needed because git and other vcs systems are file based so you
> >>>     need to layout your code in files (how quaint!)
> >>>     To make a long story short: The best thing to use is git with
> >>>     Metacello Baselines. Filetree is used to store code. Versioning
> >>>     you do with git tags that can be used in Baselines. Now we have a
> >>>     decent UI (iceberg) that supports the most needed workflow items.
> >>>     We have a UI for the dependency management as well (versionner)
> >>>     but it sadly targets ConfigurationOfs and not BaselineOfs. That
> >>>     needs to be changed.
> >>>
> >>>     my 2 cents,
> >>>
> >>>     Norbert
> >>>
> >>>>     Am 10.05.2017 um 07:56 schrieb Joachim Tuchel
> >>>>     <jtuc...@objektfabrik.de <mailto:jtuc...@objektfabrik.de>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>>     please forgive me if this mail is a sign of ignorance. I am not
> >>>>     a regular Pharo user and one of the reasons for this is that I
> >>>>     didn't like most of the source management tools around
> >>>>     Monticello. Coming from an envy background, it feels like not
> >>>>     being ready for prime time. Of course you guys have been proving
> >>>>     you can work with these tools quite well, but still I'd be
> >>>>     interested in using Pharo in a pure git-based environment, as it
> >>>>     most closely resembles some of the most-beloved features of envy.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Over the years there was a lot of work and discussion on
> >>>>     filetree, gitfiletree, iceberg, cypress and maybe quite a few
> >>>>     other projects that sounded promising and interesting. But I
> >>>>     must admit I lost track of what was really done and how far
> >>>>     things went in the last years.
> >>>>
> >>>>     So are there any pointers to info material that I could look at
> >>>>     to see what the current status of source control in Pharo 5 and
> >>>>     Pharo 6 is and/or will be soon?
> >>>>
> >>>>     I am mostly interested in these topics:
> >>>>
> >>>>       * git only - no monticello meta info any more - possible?
> >>>>       * tools like merge/diff, committing from within the image
> >>>>       * dependencies within my own project as well as dependencies
> >>>>         on external code in - possibly multiple - external
> repositories
> >>>>       * what is the current "most official" source repository for
> >>>>         open source code?
> >>>>       * best practices for managing complex projects and keeping old
> >>>>         versions reproducible at any time
> >>>>       * tutorial for git newbies in a Pharo context? (Like, how do I
> >>>>         start with a new packege - create folder first and do git
> >>>>         init, or start in the image and push into repo later? as I
> >>>>         said: beginners' stuff)
> >>>>
> >>>>     Thanks for pointers and help
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     Joachim
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>     --
> >>
>  -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>     Objektfabrik Joachim Tuchel          mailto:jtuc...@objektfabrik.de
> >>     Fliederweg 1                         http://www.objektfabrik.de <
> http://www.objektfabrik.de/>
> >>     D-71640 Ludwigsburg
> http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com
> >>     <http://joachimtuchel.wordpress.com/>
> >>     Telefon: +49 7141 56 10 86 0         Fax: +49 7141 56 10 86 1
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to