OK, OK, I was a little confused with passive and
active autofocus. Now I have it more clear (thanks to
the list). You can see it in my message 'my
conclusions'.
About making comparisions... I was comparing an
Espio/IQZoom with an Olympus, both AF P&S, not with
the MZ-S, of course.
Cheers,
Jaume
(when you said passive autofocus you meant active,
didn't you?. Active is infrared/measuring distance and
passive is TTL/contrast).
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jaume Lahuerta"
> Subject: RE: MZ-S Odditties
>
>
> > It is so bad because a 4-times-cheaper Olympus P&S
> was
> > able to focus without any flash aid in the same
> > situation,
>
> I presume you would rather Pentax went with passive
> autofocus?
> You realize that your AF range would then be about
> 20 feet,
> after which you would not have autofocus at all. I
> don't mean to
> belittle your concern, but lets be careful about
> what we make
> comparisons to.
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
