Hi!

which is 300 equivallent on an ist-D ;)

That said I like to consider constant f/4 as being consumer and
constant f/2.8 as being semi-pro/pro ;) I know, more like wishful
thinking :D

I'd second that. For starters, 200/4 would probably auto focus faster than 200/5.6...

I should say that I held in my dirty hands Canon 70-200/4 L and this lens weighs just order of 250 gram more than my F70-210. Yet the Canon is considerably better optic. I do admit I paid for my lens 15 times less than the (happy) owner of the Canon ;-).

Still, I agree with Thibouille.

Boris

Reply via email to