On Jun 29, 2005, at 6:56 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I'd love to se it compared to the F 70-210mm. Can anyone do that? :-) I have only had problems with my 70-210 when using (too slow) film for sports events and similar. On the *ist D I can always increase the ISO-setting.
I can't do a direct comparison because I've sold the 70-200/4L and 1.4x Extender II (not to mention that I don't have an F70-210, although I do have an A70-210/4 Macro), but here are two sets of landscape/scenic photos I posted from sessions with the 70-200/4L and 1.4x Extender in 2003. Of course, web JPEG resolution barely does this kind of photo justice...
70-200/4L alone: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/47.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/47b.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/47c.htm 70-200/4L + 1.4x Extender II: http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50a.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50b.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50c.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50d.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50e.htm http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW3/50f.htm Godfrey
