Hi, On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 04:20:03PM -0800, Fish Wang wrote: > Will do. However, I???m by no means a license expert. Based on Licensing > Terms page on MinGW???s website ([1], win32api), I believe the code I > stripped out of MinGW should be fine as long as a copy of the notice and its > license [2] is included. Please correct me if I???m wrong.
By no means a license expert myself, I think it would be good to have something like "win32-api.h" (name stands to be discussed) which has all the bits we take from MinGW with a comment and their license included (your [2], if I'm not mistaken) - so it's totally clear where the stuff came from. Less of a "technical" design issue, but being nice about attribution. > [2] > http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw/mingw-org-wsl/ci/21762bb4a1bd0c88c38eead03f59e8d994349e83/tree/LICENSE gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
