On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Lawson English <lengli...@cox.net> wrote: > Lance Corrimal wrote: >> >> Am 14.03.2010 20:37, schrieb Soft Linden: >> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Lance Corrimal >>> <lance.corri...@eregion.de> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Am 14.03.2010 18:56, schrieb New Hax: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Lindens should be staying with their promises >>>>> >>>> >>>> related question, where's the svn repo to check out the server code? >>>> >>> >>> How is that in any way related? >>> >>> We're closer on some of the tech, but don't yet operate with a >>> business model where giving away the hosting business would make >>> sense. Nobody promised otherwise. >>> >> >> I might be totally wrong but I remember phil saying that the server code >> would be open sourced as well, back when snowglobe started... >> >> > > That was the intent, but I think things got away from them. By all accounts, > the server code is even more scary thant he viewer code was when first > released and with OpenSim and a C++ implementation on its way, releasing the > SL code makes no real sense for LL, IMHO.
That's going to depend on the state of other projects by the time we've solved the problems I mentioned earlier in the thread. At that point, it's going to make sense to invest all we can in increasing uptake in all SL-compatible virtual worlds. But yeah - it makes no real sense to make that investment now. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
