Me too. It's part of why I wanted it to build so bad. Others can build
it - this is actually my first successful build attempt.
--GC
On 03/15/2010 11:24 PM, Tony Agudo wrote:
Yup, that sort of proper(at least would run okay). I'm a bit tired of
seeing "no Linux binary available" on the wiki page and I'd love to do
performance comparisons of it against Viewer 2.0.
On Mar 15, 2010 10:16 PM, "Glen Canaday" <gcana...@gmail.com
<mailto:gcana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
lol.. define 'proper' ;P
Release, non-standalone? If this worls properly I'll see if I can do a
non-patched pure 2.0 build. If LL's interested, they can have it.
--GC
On 03/15/2010 11:14 PM, Tony Agudo wrote:
Congrats on the successful build, Glen. I hope this means a proper
Snowglobe 2.0 binary for Linux isn't far behind anymore.
On Mar 15, 2010 10:08 PM, "Glen Canaday" <gcana...@gmail.com
<mailto:gcana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Screwed up the topic. All better now.
>>>>>>
Linux build of Snowglobe-2.0 svn doesn't like spaces in the build path.
find: `/home/glen/Programs/Second': No such file or directory
find:
`Life/Snowglobe-2.0-build/trunk/indra/viewer-linux-i686-relwithdebinfo/newview/packaged':
No such file or directory
Bright side - got thru my fist build! Least - compiling and linking
worked.... lol
--GC
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
privileges
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
