On Friday 26 June 2009, Michel Catudal wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong here: currently, the *ENTIRE* reason > > to care about the D2XX library is to get simpler Windows support. > > Windows is not the only platform so you can't just rip that stuff off
Why not? It's the only platform OpenOCD supports where the libftdi + libusb stack seems to be a bad option. > Many people still want to create their binaries with calls to D2XX > library so it would not make sense to remove it. Yes it would make sense. Only Windows users_need_ D2XX; on other platforms, users have an alternative with fewer hassles. > I can understand the need to get a windows binary but you don't do that > by messing up the code for those who haven't crossed over or are not > willing to do so. No mess, no fuss ... everyone else is using libftdi + libusb with no particular problems. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
