David Brownell a écrit : > On Friday 26 June 2009, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > >> On the other hand, it may be easier to create a WinUSB backend for >> OpenOCD which covers the needs for OpenOCD (or libftdi) and >> OpenOCD (or libftdi) only. You may not need to be a Windows driver >> developer to do this. >> > > Correct me if I'm wrong here: currently, the *ENTIRE* reason > to care about the D2XX library is to get simpler Windows support. > > Windows is not the only platform so you can't just rip that stuff off
Many people still want to create their binaries with calls to D2XX library so it would not make sense to remove it. I can understand the need to get a windows binary but you don't do that by messing up the code for those who haven't crossed over or are not willing to do so. Michel -- Tired of Microsoft's rebootive multitasking? then it's time to upgrade to Linux. http://home.comcast.net/~mcatudal _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
