Zach Welch wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 20:26 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:18 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:38 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One of the patches since the merge of the ti_dm355.cfg line-end >>>>> update seems to have broken some aspect of scan chain discovery. >>>>> See the openocd server startup transcript below, with "scan_chain" >>>>> command debug output. (FWIW, using with an Olimex ft2232 adapter.) >>>>> >>>> Can you do a bisection to figure out which version broke you? >>>> >>> If this were using "git", I'd have done it already ... is the >>> magic SVN command "svn switch -r REVISION"? At least there's >>> only one development sequence, no branch merges to resolve. ;) >>> >> svn will probably do this *MUCH* slower than git with a cloned >> repository of course, but the syntax is essentially: >> >> svn checkout -r N ... >> >> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/re04.html >> > > Everyone thinking about hitting the repository this hard should be sure > to look into 'svnsync', which allows you to create a read-only copy of > the repository on your local machine that will be _much_ faster to use. > > Cheers, > > Zach > > _______________________________________________ > Openocd-development mailing list > Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development > Thank you, and I would say the patch from 1606 to 1607 is not valid.
Regards Magnus _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
