Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> I maintain that the whole jtag_add_dr_scan_now and changing of >> in_handler functionality must be reverted. Im am not sure about the >> exact rev, Öyvind PLEASE, you are at the moment screwing up things for >> other people without good cause. >> >> There might be a good idea there somwhere, but I am not convinced, and >> at the moment it is just messing up things. >> > > Stay with me a bit longer. We only have svn head in OpenOCD and > this is a pervasive patch that is going to mess up all other patches, > so it would *never* get tested if I tried to push this out as a patch > for everybody to test. We DO have release branches, so anyone who > needs to work with something stable *can* use the release branch. > In the long term I believe and hope svn head will be more stable than > this on average though! > > Anyone who has used svn head the last couple of weeks knows that > there is a lot going on now and my thinking was to get this particular > set of changes out of the way so we can go into a more quiet phase. > > You can add your stuff for testing, ok no problem. You can put things in plase so that I can test and profile potential changes. But you are stepping on my toes by changing things I work on.
The in_handlers are not depreciated, you are suggeting that they should be. a big difference, and I think they should stay. Magnus _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
