On Wed, 1 May 2024 20:45:27 GMT, Christoph Langer <clan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> While working in that area I found some potential for cleanup of a few tests.
>> 
>> Most notably:
>> 
>> B5045306.java:
>> - does not need to run in othervm
>> - the executor service that it uses should be shut down eventually to free 
>> resources
>> 
>> B8291637.java:
>> - use just one instead of two test VM invocations
>> KeepAliveTimerThread.java:
>> call to grp.destroy() at the end is pointless (API is void & deprecated for 
>> removal)
>> 
>> Generally:
>> The deprecated URL constructor is used. It can be switched to the handy 
>> URIBuilder
>> Some more try with resources here and there
>
> Christoph Langer has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains ten additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Further review suggestions
>  - Merge branch 'master' into keepalivetests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into keepalivetests
>  - Fix two URLs
>  - Merge branch 'master' into keepalivetests
>  - Jaikiran's comments
>  - Update test/jdk/sun/net/www/http/KeepAliveCache/B5045306.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Andrey Turbanov <turban...@gmail.com>
>  - Copyright year
>  - JDK-8330814

Hello Christoph, the latest changes look fine to me. I've added a trivial 
comment about reading the inputstream in one of the test, but you can leave it 
in its current form if you prefer to.
Please run `tier2` tests once before integrating.

test/jdk/sun/net/www/http/KeepAliveCache/B8291637.java line 144:

> 142:                 int c;
> 143:                 byte[] buf = new byte[256];
> 144:                 while ((c = i.read(buf)) != -1) {

Given that the server response is just a hello world message, I think you can 
just replace this entire code within the try block with something like:


int count;
try (InputStream i = urlc.getInputStream()) {
    count = i.readAllBytes().length;
}


If you prefer to leave it in the current form, that's fine too.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by jpai (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18884#pullrequestreview-2042246470
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18884#discussion_r1591917930

Reply via email to