Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Steve Talley [05/16/02 21:00:35 CEST] wrote: > > Rocco Rutte wrote: > > > * Steve Talley [05/16/02 19:19:39 CEST] wrote: > > > > > > > This is handled by the filter_message patch, posted on 3/26. > > > > The output of your filter is integrated into your mailbox as a > > > > new message, and the old message is marked for deletion. > > > > > > I don't why I've missed this one. It would really solve this > > > problem but would break things completely up, at least in my > > > case because my filter produces some output I really do not want > > > to be written back to my box. > > > > Your filter could write the unwanted output to STDERR, which is > > displayed to the user but not included in the resulting message. > > Maybe I'm missing something, but in my case I saw quite a few > problems if I don't redirect stderr to stdout. I always had to > redraw the screen via ^L.
Do you have $wait_key set? Steve
