* Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 12:12]:
> * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 11:32]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Patrick [05/16/02 17:29:54 CEST] wrote:
> > > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-16-02 09:04]:
> > > > * David T-G [05/16/02 15:47:11 CEST] wrote:
> > > > > If you just want to relay instead of send, well, that's probably tough;
> >
> > But the point is that not all dial-up connections are in the
> > common blacklists while lots of them are. If you feel
> > confident, try to deliver an email directly to my university's
> > account (in From: header). A few mails I receive are simply
> > forwards of bounces containing the original mail which was
> > rejected.
>
> Well, I'm not necessairly confident, but GAME. Does it work?? I'll
> only know if it bounces back to me (which may not happen) or you reply.
oops, ??
> > > AND, both my dial-up and cable providers had smtp accounts available
> > > for sending mail. Why not set sendmail to use your provider's smtp
> > > account??
> >
> > I have to. Just because I'm too lazy to first try direct
> > delivery and later via relay if I received a failure notice.
>
> I think that with SuSE direct delivery is the easiest. It did not
> require any setup other than NOT setting mail to an smtp.xxxx.xxx host.
>
> ps. I use postfix, not sendmail.
--
Patrick Shanahan
Registered Linux User #207535
@ http://counter.li.org
