Hi, * Steve Talley [05/16/02 21:00:35 CEST] wrote: > Rocco Rutte wrote: > > * Steve Talley [05/16/02 19:19:39 CEST] wrote:
> > > This is handled by the filter_message patch, posted on 3/26. The > > > output of your filter is integrated into your mailbox as a new > > > message, and the old message is marked for deletion. > > I don't why I've missed this one. It would really solve this problem > > but would break things completely up, at least in my case because my > > filter produces some output I really do not want to be written back > > to my box. > Your filter could write the unwanted output to STDERR, which is > displayed to the user but not included in the resulting message. Maybe I'm missing something, but in my case I saw quite a few problems if I don't redirect stderr to stdout. I always had to redraw the screen via ^L. Cheers, Rocco.
