On 2001-07-10 19:08:27 -0500, Andy Spiegl wrote: >By the way you are also wrong about the proof of the 60 seconds. >:-) I had done this test not 5 months ago, but very recently. >Only the timestamp of the file is from February! Thinking about it, the code in question makes sure that an mbox folder's mtime is always the point of time at which the last message was _added_ to the folder. Might be helpful with some naive new-mail checking programs, but of course breaks mechanisms which really look for mailbox updates. Mh... -- Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
- timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- duplicated it [Re: timestamp of mailbox file is n... Tony Godshall
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Luke Ross
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Thomas Roessler
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Matt Dunford
- Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated Andy Spiegl