Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated

[Thomas Roessler]

Depends on what kind of heuristic bash applies.

On 2001-07-11 21:29:23 +0100, Luke Ross wrote:
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:29:23 +0100
>From: Luke Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mutt User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: timestamp of mailbox file is not updated
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
>
>Hi
>
>> > Might be helpful with some naive new-mail checking programs, but of 
>> > course breaks mechanisms which really look for mailbox updates.
>> I vote for removing the code.  (c:
>> Anyone objects?
>
>Will it affect bash telling me I have new mail?  (As in, it'll say I do
>every time I quit mutt?)
>
>Luke
>-- 
>Luke Ross - http://lcr.sys3175.co.uk/



-- 
Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/