On 2020-07-24 09:42:06 -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 05:03:09PM +1200, Tom Ryder wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 06:56:38AM +0200, Claus Assmann wrote:
> > > > Would you or Maxim consider making it a _("translatable
> > > > string")---or perhaps even better, a configurable one---for
> > > > those who speak other languages?
> > >
> > > Other than Latin?
> > > "Re:" is a standard that should not be translated.
> >
> > Agreed; what I mean is that it would be good to be able to configure the
> > string after "Re:" for replies to empty subjects. That said, though, it
> > could perhaps be done with hooks.
>
> I think the subject setting occurs too early for hooks to be effective.
Shouldn't the reply-hook occur earlier?
There are some other cases where one may want to modify the subject,
e.g. to remove a mailing-list tag in a private reply or to remove a
"(was: ...)" part (hoping that's possible).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
