> Usually a good idea to add "-N value" with "-K kvcd" anyhow since the > quantization matrices for kvcd already contain modifications to > the high frequency quantizers.
Is this really what you want to say? It contradicts a previous mail of yours where you suggest _not_ to combine -N and -K kvcd. I am going to read "Usually a good idea" as "Probably not a good idea". Right? :-) > Enlarge the image ;) Sure, but on a stupid TV set, resolution seems less of an issue. > Hmmm, can't say I've seen that effect. I see a "blue streaks" effect > when using ffmpeg on a G4 system running OS/X but I think that's > a different issue. I can send a screenshot. Maybe it's a mplayer bug, since it doesn't show when playing it with the DVD player... > I have not tried it but I have my doubts that ffmpeg, as fast as > it is, can do DVD sized MPEG-2 encoding in real time. But it _is_ faster than mjpegtools, right? In that case, is quality the penalty? Or player compatibility? > Also, did you notice that his system was a dual cpu system? That Yes I did notice and envy ;-) > The main disadvantages I see with a all in one capture/encode method > [snip] > creation with ffmpeg has worked for some and not for others. At the Okay, that answers my previous question. I will try with my player. I do prefer to create compatible cd's though. Guess mjpegtools is the way to go then. > I'll have to try ffmpeg's MPEG-2 encoding and see how fast it > actually is but realtime 720x480 or 720x576 I am doubtful (realtime > VCD MPEG-1 I have seen work on a fast system). I will try it too. Thanks again for your extensive reply. Maarten ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users