Happy Halloween! On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:03 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
> So...uhh...this is kind of embarrassing. I may have fixed it (OSPF just > his adjacency of 19h, previous max uptime was 12 hours). Someone mentioned > the Ubnt backhaul versions or something so I double checked and it never > got updated. One of the two backhauls was running 5.5 or something > ancient. I upgraded it and everything seems to be OK now, at least we're > hitting a new record after 4 days of <12 hour uptimes. > > I don't work much with multicast but I was always under the impression > that APWDS and STAWDS simply acted as a transparent bridge. Clearly it > doesn't. > > Sorry for the noise and thanks for the sanity checks/making me look at the > firmware versions on the backhauls! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users < > mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > >> I would make sure spanning tree is off on the 750 sw bridge and go ahead >> and turn off Multicast Enhancement on the APs (leave Multicast Allowed as >> enabled). >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:52 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> wrote: >> >> Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled on the >> AP. The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no option for Multicast >> Enhancement. Should I disable the enhancement on the AP only? I assume I >> have to enable Multicast on these links. (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is >> 3.65 GHz - 802.11n "M" gear). >> >> There is an RB750 switch (software bridge). L2 MTU 1598. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users < >> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >> >>> I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a >>> while then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix >>> it makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs. >>> Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the >>> adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of >>> the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network >>> type. Anyway, it’s not the issue. >>> Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled) >>> Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the >>> two UBNT links in the middle? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>> >>> In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and >>> then put your good IPs on top of the eoip? >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson <ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Ours was/is a /29. >>>> >>>> >>>> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>>> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>>> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>>> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/> >>>> <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>>> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Between the two routers it's a /30 >>>>> >>>>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch. >>>>> About 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users < >>>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks >>>>>> around these links? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>>>>> > Hey Josh, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. >>>>>> What >>>>>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an >>>>>> AF24<>AF24 >>>>>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where >>>>>> the >>>>>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these >>>>>> scenarios. >>>>>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each >>>>>> has >>>>>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary >>>>>> and >>>>>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency >>>>>> and >>>>>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the >>>>>> same >>>>>> > result. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but >>>>>> was >>>>>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that >>>>>> it >>>>>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it >>>>>> in >>>>>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this >>>>>> for >>>>>> > about 8 months now. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround >>>>>> that >>>>>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and >>>>>> imho is >>>>>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Cheers! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>>>>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>>>>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=460+TAMPICO,IL+61283&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * >>>>>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>>>>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>>>>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the >>>>>> RB750. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Josh Luthman >>>>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> > 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>> > Suite 1337 >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org >>>>>> > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run >>>>>> > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links >>>>>> with >>>>>> > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when >>>>>> most >>>>>> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, >>>>>> > smart or dumb, brand? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo >>>>>> port? >>>>>> > Is it in the switch group? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > Scott Lambert KC5MLE >>>>>> Unix >>>>>> > SysAdmin >>>>>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> >>>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > -- -RickG
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
