On 09/08/2015 10:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: >>> On 09/08/2015 08:17 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: >>>> On 09/08/2015 08:10 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>>> I'll give it a shot on NVIDIA and see what happens... my tests might >>>>> require GL 3.2 because I didn't want to deal with the various >>>>> differences that happen otherwise. >>>> >>>> That should be good enough. Perhaps someone else can try on AMD >>>> closed-source drivers. If they both ignore the spec, then I feel pretty >>>> comfortable ignoring it too... while I work on getting it changed. >>> >>> I have attached the spec changes that I am proposing. >> >> This drops the dependence on images, which means that gallium drivers >> can get this straight away. From a "allow the extension to run on as >> many devices as possible" standpoint, this makes sense. There's an >> alternate viewpoint which is that this should perhaps require *both* >> images and ARB_texture_multisample (without requiring any specific >> GLSL version). >> >> I've only looked at things from the driver writer's standpoint, i.e. >> "make as many exts available as possible", so I'm definitely in favor >> :) But I could also easily live with leaving the images requirement in >> there. > > BTW, I knew something felt off about your change... I just figured out > what -- there is no GLSL 3.20 :) There's a GL 3.2 and a GLSL 1.50.
Hot off the presses... with s/3.20/1.50/, my change was accepted. This should show up in the Khronos registry "soon." Patch 1 is also Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.roman...@intel.com> > -ilia _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
