On 13 April 2017 at 06:03, Markus Trippelsdorf <mar...@trippelsdorf.de> wrote: > On 2017.04.12 at 20:45 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 12 April 2017 at 20:34, Constantine Kharlamov <hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote: >> >> >> I suspect this breaks because r600 more often fails to >> >> compile some shaders, >> >> and the hw requires a fragment shader and we use the empty one as a >> >> fallback in that case. >> > >> > Ok, that wasn't obvious, I running the system with the patchset on HD5730, >> > including >> > piglit testing — so far is fine. >> > >> If in doubt ask the bug reporter(s) to test a patch on their machines. > > Well, the question is why bother with this legacy code at all? > I would expect a much more conservative approach. Except for essential > patches to keep the hardware running, everything else should be > rejected. Nobody is expecting new features for this ancient hardware > anyway.
I do have 90% of GL4.3 for evergreen and newer done in a branch, It's just a lack of time to fix the last few hangs and motivate myself to get it posted/reviewied. Then of course getting sb support. Dave. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
