Isn't that version because it uses indirect rendering? AFAIK indirect limits GL version to 1.4. There is the version of X's AIGLX driver in parentheses, but only 1.4 features can be used.
But it may not be the case here. Could you check wheter glxinfo says that direct rendering is enabled? 2011/6/20 tom fogal <tfo...@sci.utah.edu>: > I am trying to get some regression tests to run in Xvfb. On my > workstation, the GL_VERSION string from this is: > > 1.4 (2.1 Mesa 7.7.1) > > according to glxinfo. The extensions fairly clearly show 2.x features. > Is it perhaps the case that 2.1 features were available in 7.7.1, but > not /all/ 2.1 features, and thus this was labelled incorrectly? The > version string seems "fixed" in more modern versions. > > In any case, the above version string breaks projects like GLEW > -- one application I have breaks because GLEW doesn't try to load > glGenBuffers, thinking it will not be there. A string like the above > suggests that GLEW should just try to load whatever it can, and just > ignore the version string from the library. > > Thoughts? > > -tom > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
