On 11-06-20 01:22 PM, tom fogal wrote:
I am trying to get some regression tests to run in Xvfb. On my
workstation, the GL_VERSION string from this is:
1.4 (2.1 Mesa 7.7.1)
according to glxinfo. The extensions fairly clearly show 2.x features.
Is it perhaps the case that 2.1 features were available in 7.7.1, but
not /all/ 2.1 features, and thus this was labelled incorrectly? The
version string seems "fixed" in more modern versions.
In any case, the above version string breaks projects like GLEW
-- one application I have breaks because GLEW doesn't try to load
glGenBuffers, thinking it will not be there. A string like the above
suggests that GLEW should just try to load whatever it can, and just
ignore the version string from the library.
Thoughts?
From section "3.3.2 GLX Versioning" of the GLX 1.4 spec:
"
The version string is laid out as follows:
<major version.minor version><space><vendor-specific info>
Both the major and minor portions of the version number are of arbitrary
length. The vendor-specific information is optional. However, if it is
present, the format and contents are implementation specific.
"
So any app that confuses the vendor-specific info for the version
major.minor has a bug (though one I've seen before).
In the context of debugging problems with indirect GLX those
parenthetical versions are quite helpful.
-Nathan
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
