Charlie, why are all your posts full of invective for Marv? How does this ad hominem attitude move the discussion forward? Can you explain your need to disparage his position to make your points?On Mar 14, 2024, at 9:20 PM, Marv Gandall <marvga...@gmail.com> wrote:
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#29452) |
Reply To Group
| Reply To Sender
|
Mute This Topic
| New Topic
POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [arch...@mail-archive.com] _._,_._,_
|
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< vict... hari kumar
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Marv Gandall
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... David Walters
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... hari kumar
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< victory a... Michael Meeropol
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< vict... Marv Gandall
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Charlie
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Marv Gandall
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Charlie
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Marv Gandall
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< ... Bobby MacVeety
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< victory at the Academ... stevencolatrella
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< victory at the Academy Awa... Mark Baugher
- Re: [marxmail] Oppenheimer< victory at the Academ... Marv Gandall