They are indeed quite quick to respond, and they used to unblock us fast enough.
In this case, they have a block on one of our SMTP server that sent ONE offending e-mail 12 months ago. Right now we are debating with their support how to move forward but they are adamant about that webpage, which is silly, because if they were to really stick to that, not many providers would meet that regulation. I don't understand that rule at all. Scott​ On Monday, 14/04/2025 at 11:15 Florian Effenberger via mailop wrote: Hello, Scott Q. via mailop wrote on 14.04.25 at 17:02: > It seems they have a new internal regulation where they want the sending > domain to be explicitly linked to the actual owner that sends the e- > mails. Which makes sense in theory but there's a lot of providers out > there, including us, GoDaddy, ResellerClub, etc that use private domain > names ( think secureserver.net ) that ​intentionally don't say who the > owner is. you mean the imprint regulation? That seems in place for quite a while. They essentially want to have an imprint on the main domain of the sending mail server. E.g. mx1.mydomain.foo -> mydomain.foo needs an imprint There's been heated debate repeatedly about this, to say it diplomatically. :) What I can say is that they are at least quite fast in unblocking. I wrote a small paragraph about it on https://effenberger.org/en/howtos/return-to-sender-2/ ("Provider specific: Deutsche Telekom, T-Online"). Florian _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
