It appears that Gellner, Oliver via mailop <oliver.gell...@dm.de> said: > >> On 19.08.2023 at 19:01 Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote: >> >> Is "-all" not indeed a policy in SPF, directed by the domain owner? I would >> argue that it is. Especially given that there are options there, each one >> defining how the domain >owner wishes SPF failure to be treated. I would find it odd to say that should >ignore domain owners when they say "-all" since that's a direct and clear >request by them. > >SPF contains information about which IP addresses are authorized or >unauthorized to send messages for a given domain. It does not contain a policy >on what to do with this information.
What's the difference among -all ~all ?all if it's not policy? (I'm not saying one should pay a lot of attention to the policy, but it's a policy.) R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
