It appears that L. Mark Stone via mailop <mark.st...@missioncriticalemail.com> said: > >Ah! Even better. We are pretty much on the same page then I expect.
There's a whole lot of perfectly normal sending situations that SPF can't describe. (They mostly incude the words "relay" or "forward".) So if you reject on -all you'll aways lose a fair amount of real mail. It's between you and your users how they feel about losing mail they want vs. getting more spam. In my experience, they mind the missing mail a lot more. R's, John PS: This is not to deny that hotmail's SPF record is really screwed up. >L. Mark Stone, Founder >North America's Leading Zimbra VAR/BSP/Training Partner >For Companies With Mission-Critical Email Needs > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mark Alley via mailop" <mailop@mailop.org> >To: "mailop" <mailop@mailop.org> >Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 12:06:18 PM >Subject: Re: [mailop] hotmail.com SPF forgot IPv6 > > > >Granted, my only point was around message rejection itself with no >consideration for other email authentication context. > _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
