UCEPROTECT just recently changed their listing criteria for level 3 listings (blacklisting an entire ASN).
Direct source: http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=12&s=0 What they don't make clear (for whatever reason) is the actual change. Previously if 0.2% of a provider's IPs were blacklisted, then the entire provider ASN would be listed on level 3. Now it is 0.02%. Old policy: https://web.archive.org/web/20200304061553/http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=3&s=5 New/current policy: http://www.uceprotect.net/en/index.php?m=3&s=5 This means a provider like OVH "only" requires 716 blacklisted IPs to get their entire ASN on level 3, rather than 7,167 previously (based on the amount of IPs they currently have). Looking back on my infrequent checking of UCEPROTECT, that means OVH will probably be permanently on level 3. In fact, a number of other large, well-known providers are now listed on level 3 as well. Kind regards Bastiaan Am 20.01.2021 um 12:00 schrieb mailop-requ...@mailop.org: > Hello, > just got an information from MxToolbox that my IP (actually not my IP in > particular, but the ASN it belongs to) has been blacklisted at UCEPROTECT > level 3. Checking of my IP (217.182.79.147) at > http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php gives the info that it has been > listed because there were 1868 spamming IPs from within this ASN last 7 > days while their threshold for level 3 listing is 717. > > My question is: how widely is this BL (UCEPROTECT level 3) used? Do I have > to worry about deliverability? Their page tells me to ask my provider to fix > the issue, which I will do, but... it's OVH, so you know... > > I also find it quite impudent that the people who run UCEPROTECT offer > the whitelisting option (ips.whitelisted.org), but request payment for it... > If you provide access to blacklist for free, you should whitelist for free > as well. > _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
