Hey guys.
About the mail thing, just switch to classic layout under viewing in Mail’s 
preferences. That way, you can navigate by and hide/show columns you don’t want 
or need.
HTH,
Matthew Campbell


On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Buddy Brannan <bu...@brannan.name> wrote:

> Also, it would seem to me that Tim Cook is at least as committed to 
> accessibility and inclusion as was his predecessor. He’s the guy in charge. 
> He’s the 50,000 foot view big picture guy. 
> 
> As to complaints about Voiceover’s not improving between 10.9.0 and 10.9.1, 
> I’d say there are some improvements, but some of what y’all are asking for, 
> such as having the read/unread status read at the beginning of the row 
> instead of at the end, I suspect, are more design changes in Mail than they 
> are with Voideover itself. I wish that it’d read the other way too, but if 
> the columns are ordered such that the read/unread status is at the far right 
> instead of the far left, how do you propose Voiceover handle that? I find 
> some value in having information presented in the way that it’s presented to 
> everyone else. Sure, I’d love to be able to rearrange the columns so that 
> things would read in the order I want them to, but that’s not Voiceover’s 
> fault. Yes, there are things that *are* Voiceover’s fault, like the 
> inconsistent VO+J behavior, the “Blah blah busy” thing, the “1 row added” 
> thing. But guess what? This is what we asked for. We wanted built-in 
> accessibility to mainstream products, and we got it. There’s good with that 
> as well as bad. I, personally, think the good outweighs the bad, but there 
> are tradeoffs, including that we sometimes have to wait longer for bugs to 
> get fixed. Stand in line, because your bugs get stuck in the pile with 
> everyone else’s bugs. 
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Ricardo Walker <rwalker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would also like to point out, the accessibility team is made up of more 
>> people than the people who read our e-mails and answer our calls.  There are 
>> a few dedicated Voiceover engineers.  I’m guessing not many, but a few that 
>> work on Voiceover specific issues.  I think we must understand like most 
>> huge companies, maybe even more so with Apple, things are very 
>> compartmentalized.  So, there might be an accessibility issue in Mail for 
>> example that the people responsible for the Mail app must address.  Sure, 
>> the VO engineers might assist, and point out the errors on a technical 
>> level, but they might not be a high priority for the Mail team to address, 
>> and the Voiceover team just doesn’t have access to that to do it themselves. 
>>  They might well be as frustrated as you or I.  And this stuff about Steve’s 
>> Jobs passing being related to the lessoning or enhancing of Apple 
>> accessibility sounds so silly to me its not even funny.  I mean guys, do you 
>> not remember me and others complaining about access to third party icons in 
>> the status menu?  That wasn’t added until last year.  If my math is right, 
>> Steve Jobs had been gone over a year by then.  I don’t hear anyone thanking 
>> Tim cook for this. lol.  Yes, don’t get me wrong, I think Steve Jobs and 
>> others at Apple felt strongly about accessibility.  But less not kid 
>> ourselves.  I don’t think Jobs was spending sleepless nights trying to 
>> figure out how to make Voiceover better.  After all, there was a gap of 
>> around 4 years where the Mac was completely inaccessible.  I’m just pointing 
>> out facts here folks.  I’m as biggest Steve Jobs fan as you might find, but 
>> I’m not going to delude  myself in thinking he coded Voiceover with his own 
>> two hands. :).
>> 
>> JMO.
>> 
>> Ricardo Walker
>> rica...@appletothecore.info
>> Twitter:@apple2thecore
>> www.appletothecore.info
>> 
>> On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Ray Foret Jr <rforet7...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Of late, I have noticed complaints against the Apple accessibility team as 
>>> if to suggest that we are being ignored.  It seems to be the belief of some 
>>> that the Apple accessibility team fixes accessibility bugs and problems 
>>> with Voice Over.  I do not believe that this is the case.  It is my belief 
>>> that the Apple accessibility team has, in fact, a very limited role at 
>>> Apple.  Frankly, with the passing of the late great Steve Jobs, that role 
>>> has perhaps demenished greatly. I believe that the Apple accessibility team 
>>> never has had actual decision making capacity with respect to actual 
>>> implementation of fixes for Voice Over.  They didn’t even have this power 
>>> under Steve Jobs.  Unless I am very much mistaken, all the accessibility 
>>> team has any power to do is to forward our findings over to the development 
>>> teams but nothing more.  They cannot even tell us whether or not our 
>>> reports will be acted upon.  Now, this last is most likely a part of 
>>> Apple’s non disclosure policy:  however, I suspect that even if this was 
>>> not so, Apple’s accessibility team would not be informed in any case.  In 
>>> short, it seems that the only function that this accessibility team has and 
>>> will ever have at Apple is not much more than a kind of clearing house of 
>>> feedback from us blind users.  I cannot help wonder how many Apple app 
>>> developmental teams look at submissions from the accessibility team and say 
>>> to themselves, “Oh, no, not again.”.  I suspect that this explains why it 
>>> is that our reports seem to go unheeded.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Mac, the only computer with full accessibility for the blind 
>>> built-in!
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> The Constantly Barefooted Ray, still a very happy Mac and Iphone 5 user!
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to