I'm not really sure what your point is. You had a total agreement from me in terms of bsd until you mentioned an X-windows desktop (x is just the system, you need a window manager on top of that). If you are suggesting a window server plus a window manager is more stable than BSD, then you're totally insane. Not to mention good luck getting most window managers plus the x server to run on a 486.

Second, the ISS uses linux and windows, not BSD. That's not to say BSD isn't used, but from the research I just did, I did not see anything about BSD mentioned. Most notably though, I seen nothing about a 486--I actually seen that laptops running windows are used as well as Linux laptops.

Second, 486 is not "easier to code for." If you're looking at Intel's instruction set, it was fairly massive at 486 as well. Unless you are writing pure assembly, it's not really a huge issue as most normal compilers will output asm that can be written specifically for the processor it is being compiled for. This means that it can take advantage of those instructions that were added later on, like AVX/etc.

On 12/18/2013 12:34 AM, eric oyen wrote:
its one of the reasons why they still use 486 class intel machines on the ISS. 
Its simpler to code for them and they have a proven track record of being 
reliable. You don't need to run the latest windows on them either as a recent 
(and thoroughly debugged) version of Linux or OpenBSD with an X desktop will do.

How about the software they use in aircraft? the san francisco airline disaster 
of 2 months ago is a case in point. Because there was no ground controlling 
signals, the software was forced to go off its own internal database (which was 
not completely debugged). That and pilot error added up to disaster.

so, like the other poster stated, if you like your software buggy and your 
customer service piss poor, we would like to know who is paying you for it.

-eric

On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:06 PM, David Tanner wrote:

So, I guess you have never seen anyone else or any other organization whose 
technology wasn't absoluetly perfect.

Maybe you would like to be over 200 miles up in space wondering if you would 
get back to earth because the software on the spacelab wasn't working right.  
Or, what about the huge software bugs in the new health care program of the 
federal goverment.

If you find that perfect technology and the perfect company with perfect 
customer service please let us know who they are and how much they paid you for 
your praise.


Sent from my accessible iPhone

On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Cheree Heppe <che...@dogsc4me.com> wrote:

Cheree Heppe here:
Would you suggeat, then, that the blindness accessibility fall into the 
category of a publicity stunt and that Apple gets to accessibility elements 
when it benefits this aim?
I have experienced increasing bugs across the IOS platform that impair 
function.  I am collecting my info systematically and intend to mention it.

Regards,
Cheree Heppe


Sent from my IPhone 4S

On 17 Dec 2013, at 5:58, Ricardo Walker <rwalker...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I would also like to point out, the accessibility team is made up of more 
people than the people who read our e-mails and answer our calls.  There are a 
few dedicated Voiceover engineers.  I’m guessing not many, but a few that work 
on Voiceover specific issues.  I think we must understand like most huge 
companies, maybe even more so with Apple, things are very compartmentalized.  
So, there might be an accessibility issue in Mail for example that the people 
responsible for the Mail app must address.  Sure, the VO engineers might 
assist, and point out the errors on a technical level, but they might not be a 
high priority for the Mail team to address, and the Voiceover team just doesn’t 
have access to that to do it themselves.  They might well be as frustrated as 
you or I.  And this stuff about Steve’s Jobs passing being related to the 
lessoning or enhancing of Apple accessibility sounds so silly to me its not 
even funny.  I mean guys, do you not remember me and others complaining about 
access to third party icons in the status menu?  That wasn’t added until last 
year.  If my math is right, Steve Jobs had been gone over a year by then.  I 
don’t hear anyone thanking Tim cook for this. lol.  Yes, don’t get me wrong, I 
think Steve Jobs and others at Apple felt strongly about accessibility.  But 
less not kid ourselves.  I don’t think Jobs was spending sleepless nights 
trying to figure out how to make Voiceover better.  After all, there was a gap 
of around 4 years where the Mac was completely inaccessible.  I’m just pointing 
out facts here folks.  I’m as biggest Steve Jobs fan as you might find, but I’m 
not going to delude  myself in thinking he coded Voiceover with his own two 
hands. :).

JMO.

Ricardo Walker
rica...@appletothecore.info
Twitter:@apple2thecore
www.appletothecore.info

On Dec 17, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Ray Foret Jr <rforet7...@comcast.net> wrote:

Of late, I have noticed complaints against the Apple accessibility team as if 
to suggest that we are being ignored.  It seems to be the belief of some that 
the Apple accessibility team fixes accessibility bugs and problems with Voice 
Over.  I do not believe that this is the case.  It is my belief that the Apple 
accessibility team has, in fact, a very limited role at Apple.  Frankly, with 
the passing of the late great Steve Jobs, that role has perhaps demenished 
greatly. I believe that the Apple accessibility team never has had actual 
decision making capacity with respect to actual implementation of fixes for 
Voice Over.  They didn’t even have this power under Steve Jobs.  Unless I am 
very much mistaken, all the accessibility team has any power to do is to 
forward our findings over to the development teams but nothing more.  They 
cannot even tell us whether or not our reports will be acted upon.  Now, this 
last is most likely a part of Apple’s non disclosure policy:  however, I 
suspect that even if this was not so, Apple’s accessibility team would not be 
informed in any case.  In short, it seems that the only function that this 
accessibility team has and will ever have at Apple is not much more than a kind 
of clearing house of feedback from us blind users.  I cannot help wonder how 
many Apple app developmental teams look at submissions from the accessibility 
team and say to themselves, “Oh, no, not again.”.  I suspect that this explains 
why it is that our reports seem to go unheeded.


Sent from my Mac, the only computer with full accessibility for the blind 
built-in!

Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray, still a very happy Mac and Iphone 5 user!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
Take care,
Ty
http://tds-solutions.net
He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that 
dares not reason is a slave.
Sent from my Toaster (tm).


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to