Too young to remember the civil rights movement, eh? Sent from my IPhone 4S
On 22/04/2013, at 4:15, Ricardo Walker <rwalker...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, So there shouldn't be men and women rest rooms? :). Just keep in mind, separate might not always mean equal but, equal doesn't always mean fair either. JMO. Ricardo Walker rica...@appletothecore.info Twitter:@apple2thecore www.appletothecore.info On Apr 22, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Cheree Heppe <che...@dogsc4me.com> wrote: > Separate is never equal. > > Sent from my IPhone 4S > > On 21/04/2013, at 13:16, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > Interesting discussion. > This is just a suggestion. > Why does access have to be included in the same ratings system at all? > Two ideas come to mind here, again just as a question. > First why not create an a-class or an I class designation. a for accessible > or i for inclusion. Make it a marketing designation, not a strictly > developers one. > as in is your ap good or cool enough for Apple's a-class? give developers a > pr reason to want to make the applications work...just because the > designation has marketing value. > I mean after all according to the center for disease Control stateside some > 21 million people fall under the sight issue umbrella. that does not even > begin to count the other populations who benefit from vo functionality. > Take it totally out of the help those people arena and into the marketing > because you want those customers arena. also saves the reworking Erik has > outlined below. > second, and again I am simply wondering, should not Apple have the final and > only firm say as to if an application works with vo? > I mean letting random people as noted here vent their frustration against a > company they do not like would be counter productive. So why base it on > something so individual in the first place? > There are as many variations on how a person uses a product as there are > people using that product. > best to well put it all in a different category anyway. One that rewards > Apple for making the effort, and rewards developers who take the time. > Just my perspective, > Karen > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013, erik burggraaf wrote: > >> Hi, you can't have a rating of 1 to 5 for accessibility. I think this is a >> good idea and I'd like it to happen, but I don't think you've thought it >> through very well, as with all the others who have voiced it before you. >> This is nothing new believe me. >> >> First, you can't have an accessibility rating from one to five. The reason >> is that a significant portion of the user base won't be actively using the >> product with accessibility features and therefore won't be in a position to >> rate the accessibility fairly. The rating has to be from 0 or n/a to 5 >> excellent or fully accessible. >> >> Second, if you make an accessibility rating from 0 to 5, that means you have >> to make all of the other criteria 0 to 5 as well. In short, you are asking >> for a complete rewrite of the database used to track the ratings, not to >> mention the front end. >> >> Third, once you have added the ability to have a 0 rating, you then have to >> assess how being rated 0 on one of the criteria effects the overall rating >> of an app and make sure the math is done properly so the rating system is >> fair. >> >> Fourth, after you've completely rewritten the rating system, How do you >> prevent disenfranchised people who either got bad support or had a product >> fail or conflict with other things running on their machine, or who just >> didn't like the price and thought they'd show the developer what fore, from >> rating the accessibility a 1 without even knowing or caring what that rating >> is for. That would mislead users and compromise the rating system, and >> there are plenty of people out there lazy, stupid or vindictive enough to do >> something like that. >> >> Again, I think it's a great idea, and I wish apple had taken it into account >> when they were building their software distribution model. But I don't >> think any amount of forum posting is going to get a move on this. I'm sure >> hundreds of us have written to accessibil...@apple.com and requested this >> feature, since it comes up on the list once every three to six months or so. >> It's on their radar and if anything can reasonably be done about it, the >> odds are good that it will be done. You would be well off adding your voice >> to the ones who have already lobbied for this using approved channels and >> then waiting for it to happen. Apple has listened to us in the past and >> though we don't usually hear from them, we have no reason to think that they >> aren't still listening. >> >> Best, >> >> Erik Burggraaf >> Follow my series of articles about setting up a small business through the >> ontario disability support program at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com/blog >> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194 >> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com >> >> On 2013-04-21, at 3:29 PM, jshandr...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> >>> Hey Guys, >>> >>> I am writing this post in hopes of your support. I'm getting frustrated >>> with some developers lack of dedication to accessibility for their apps. >>> This isn't to slam all. Their are quite a few who understand importance. >>> There are a lot of developers who don't respond to emails when you write >>> them. I think that Apple should consider a rating for accessibility in the >>> ios and Mac app stores. Maybe 1 to 5, for completely inaccessible to >>> completely accessible. Maybe if developers see it in writing, they might be >>> inclined to fix it. >>> >>> I'm including a link to a post I put on AppleVis. Please consider signing >>> here or there. >>> >>> I also find it demeaning to contact Apple for credit on completely >>> inaccessible apps. I'm not talking partially inaccessible. Their are quite >>> a few which we find work arounds. We have all encountered the ones where >>> developer make no effort, which is wrong because Apple does provide tools >>> to make apps accessible. >>> >>> Thank you for your time. I will forward to Apple with feedback given. >>> >>> AppleVis link: >>> http://www.applevis.com/forum/accessibility-advocacy/app-accessibility-please-read >>> >>> jP >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
