Hello Ricardo and all: Would have to agree with you. Itunes has worked quite well on this end. That was not always the case. When voiceover first can on the scene, Itunes was quite difficult to navigate. In the name of accurate journalism, Itunes is quite a good product now regardless of historical evolution.
Other products are quite good as well though hey ... you purchased an apple product ;). Even if it became accessible not sure I would put MS office on this machine ... or any other ... hahahaha Take good care and I wish you enough. On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Ricardo Walker wrote: > I hear people say this a lot but, really? Whats so bad about iTunes on the > Mac? I have no problems with it what so ever. > > Ricardo Walker > rwalker...@gmail.com > Twitter & Skype: rwalker296 > www.mobileaccess.org > > On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:57 AM, erik burggraaf wrote: > >> Hi donna, Just about anything is preferable to ITunes, but I think right >> now it's just the novelty of the thing for us windows switchers who have >> fond memories of winamp for windows. Especially before it got bought out by >> AOL. These days I get my windows clients to start out on the KM player >> since winamp is now chuck full of bloatware. >> >> I'm not tempted to try it myself since vlc does what I need but winamp for >> the mac has been too long in coming for sure. Hopefully the great pioneers >> on this list will convince AOL to take an accessible direction with winamp >> development and then we'll have yet another option. >> >> Best, >> >> Erik Burggraaf >> This month in Ebony Promos: Two new gps systems for demo. Mac OS Lion When >> will it be supported? Ebony Consulting at accessibility Unconference >> Toronto. To read more and subscribe, Visit: >> http://www.erik-burggraaf.com/mailman/listinfo/ebony-promos_erik-burggraaf.com >> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194 >> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com >> >> On 2011-11-05, at 8:43 AM, Goodin, Donna wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I haven't really followed the winamp thread, but I'm curious as to why >>> anyone would go to all the trouble that seems to be involved in using it? >>> Is there some reason that it's preferable to iTunes? >>> Cheers, >>> Donna >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
