Hi Ray. One thing that may help is to go in to iTune's preferences, go to the advanced section, and uncheck the option to add file to the iTunes music folder option. My apologies in advance for the probably misnaming of the option that you'll want. It's pretty close though. When you select this option, it'll stop iTune from essentially duplicating you're files. One area where it is helpful to have this on however, is when you are adding music from an external drive that you'll want to have on you're main machine. HTH.
On 2011-11-05, at 9:36 AM, Ray Foret Jr wrote: > Well, to speak frankly, I will tell you; at least from my point of view. > With regard to ITunes as a player, (and mind you I speak here strictly in > terms of the layer itself), I can't argue with it. Well, almost. ITunes > doesn't do ENQ. Okay, there's the ITunes DJ thingie I grant you, but, I > can't find tracks easily with that, and, besides, I don't want to be adding > tracks and files to the ITunes Library all the time just to make them easier > to find. Now, we come to the real issue. ITunes is so damn library > dependant. The ITunes library really sucks! Let's say I have the song "Life > Without you" and it's in the .m4a for mat. Well, I have it on my hard drive; > but, when I add it to my ITunes library, it creates a duplicate file of > exactly the same size. That means I've got two copies of the file where as I > only wish to have just one. that's a waste of disk space. The ITunes > library is so cluncky it's beyond belief. I have numorous loose files which > are not tagged and which I have no wish to add to the ITunes Library thus > making unnecessary duplicates. Much better, so far as I am concerned, to > have a layer which has ENQ and which can be triggered directly from the > finder window. In short, you locate your first file in the finder, and, you > can ENQ that file in to your player directly. Then, the next file and the > next and so forth. The player would also allow you to directly control the > cross fading between files and no lag time at all between files. That's just > the start. > > > Sincerely, > The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!! > > Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!! > > Skype name: > barefootedray > > Facebook: > facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1 > > > > On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:24 AM, Ricardo Walker wrote: > >> I hear people say this a lot but, really? Whats so bad about iTunes on the >> Mac? I have no problems with it what so ever. >> >> Ricardo Walker >> rwalker...@gmail.com >> Twitter & Skype: rwalker296 >> www.mobileaccess.org >> >> On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:57 AM, erik burggraaf wrote: >> >>> Hi donna, Just about anything is preferable to ITunes, but I think right >>> now it's just the novelty of the thing for us windows switchers who have >>> fond memories of winamp for windows. Especially before it got bought out >>> by AOL. These days I get my windows clients to start out on the KM player >>> since winamp is now chuck full of bloatware. >>> >>> I'm not tempted to try it myself since vlc does what I need but winamp for >>> the mac has been too long in coming for sure. Hopefully the great pioneers >>> on this list will convince AOL to take an accessible direction with winamp >>> development and then we'll have yet another option. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Erik Burggraaf >>> This month in Ebony Promos: Two new gps systems for demo. Mac OS Lion When >>> will it be supported? Ebony Consulting at accessibility Unconference >>> Toronto. To read more and subscribe, Visit: >>> http://www.erik-burggraaf.com/mailman/listinfo/ebony-promos_erik-burggraaf.com >>> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194 >>> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com >>> >>> On 2011-11-05, at 8:43 AM, Goodin, Donna wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I haven't really followed the winamp thread, but I'm curious as to why >>>> anyone would go to all the trouble that seems to be involved in using it? >>>> Is there some reason that it's preferable to iTunes? >>>> Cheers, >>>> Donna >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
