On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:12:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> > > Am 05.12.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > We had previously decided to release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.6 [1]. However, a > > > couple of things have changed since that conversation began that make me > > > think we should release with 5.5.1: > > > > > > 1. 5.5.1 has been released. > > > > Good news: I am able to compile LyX 2.2.0alpha2 with Qt 5.5.1 using MSVC > > 2013 (32bit). > > > > > 2. 5.6.0beta1 has been delayed five times so far [2]. Supposedly, it > > > will be released "as soon as possible" [3] but even if it is released > > > soon, we cannot be sure the final 5.6 will be released by the time we > > > want to release 2.2.0. > > > > I don't see a bug in Qt 5.5.1 that hinders us from using it for a final > > release. I cannot reproduce bug #9731 with Qt 5.5.1. > > > > regards Uwe > > What about http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9683 > > On Ubuntu-linux I see it with QT 5.5, but not with QT 5.4
From what I understand [1], Uwe can reproduce #9227 but not #9683. It would be interesting to know if this affects Mac. Scott [1] http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9683#comment:12
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
